Qualitative study about the perception of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A descriptive observational study.

The main aim of this study was to identify the perceptions of people suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) regarding the need for specialised nursing care, based on their opinions from their own experience. A qualitative design with an inductive approach based on constructivist grounded theory was conducted using a questionnaire. Almost 63 % of respondents felt that a nursing intervention was necessary for the patient's self-care and supported the care of the environment of the patient with IBD in need of care. Approximately 75 % of respondents felt that the initial nursing consultation following diagnosis of IBD was essential to address all aspects of the patient's daily life and environment for quality care and follow-up. More than 87 % of respondents felt it was important for nurses to recognise the need for referral to other professionals when caring for IBD patients and their environment to maximise their wellbeing. The percentage of females who answered yes to this last question was significantly higher than that of males (p = 0.025). Some 67.1 % of respondents felt that nurses should be responsible for informing the patient and those around them of the steps to be taken following diagnosis and what these consist of. More than 94 % of all respondents felt that IBD patients and their carers should have a plan and time for specific and appropriate education on this topic. More than 80 % of respondents agreed that the progression, monitoring, and management of their IBD should be supervised by a nurse in addition to their specialist doctor to achieve an optimal level of quality. In conclusion, this study shows that patients suffering from IBD consider the role of the nurse to be crucial in the diagnosis, management and treatment of their disease and highlights the need for specialised nurses in inflammatory bowel disease who can provide patients with high-quality healthcare.

Pediatric home confinement due to COVID-19: Somatic and anxiety spectrum consequences.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 related home confinement on the paediatric population by focusing on anxiety, behavioural disturbances and somatic symptoms. BACKGROUND: To limit the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, governments have imposed nationwide lockdowns to prevent direct contact; this has affected everyday lives and activities such as attending school classes. Such isolation may have impacted children's anxiety levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using a web-based anonymous questionnaire from 22-26 April, 2020, among children (N = 2,292) in Spain. For children below 7 years of age, parents reported the children's behavioural, emotional and somatic symptoms and family environment data on a questionnaire designed by the researchers. Children over 7 years answered the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale either independently or with their parents' assistance. RESULTS: Children over 7 years, boys in particular, scored high on the anxiety spectrum. Moreover, participants who knew someone who had suffered from COVID-19 at home or whose parent was directly involved in the pandemic, obtained higher Total Anxiety scores. Significantly high values were found in all aspects of anxiety among those who feared infection or whose parents been unemployed. Of the children below 7 years, 56.3% had four or more anxiety-related symptoms, the most frequent of which were tantrums, emotional changes, restlessness and fear of being alone. The number of symptoms reported was significant when someone in the family home had been infected with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 home confinement had a significant impact on children, causing anxiety, behavioural problems and somatic manifestations. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses play a key role in screening children who have experience confinement owing to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to detect early anxiety symptoms using tele-health. Suitable direct interventions can then be implemented or interdisciplinary manage could be started.

Clinical outcomes after fast-track care in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of multimodal perioperative care after laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at Clara Campal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain, between April 1, 2011, and July 30, 2014, and included women who were scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Fast-track (multimodal) care included provision of full preoperative verbal and written information, intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) during surgery, removal of the urinary catheter at the end of surgery, and early mobilization and solid food intake. The main outcome was the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Overall, 88 patients were included. The median hospital stay was 22.7 hours (range 5-72). Same-day discharge was feasible in 24 (27%) patients. A total of 51 (58%) women were discharged after overnight stay, 46 (90%) of whom elected to do so because of personal preference. Finally, 13 (15%) patients were discharged at least 36 hours after surgery. Eleven (13%) women visited the emergency unit after discharge and 3 (3%) were readmitted. CONCLUSION: The perioperative multimodal recovery program is safe and feasible in a selected group of women after an elective laparoscopic hysterectomy.